Large Class Management

When Pedagogical Advice Misses the Mark: A Reflection on Large-Class ESP Teaching

As a teacher of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in a Korean university, I often find myself managing classrooms of 40-60 students. My learners are shy, reluctant to speak English, overdependent on translation apps, and deeply anxious about “performing correctly.” They bring with them layers of neurodivergence, mental health struggles, and disability. The classroom space itself is cramped, tables don’t move, and the noise level can escalate quickly.

Recently, I asked for recommendations on managing these large classes. What I received was a bundle of familiar strategies: polls, backchannel tools, micro-writing, exit tickets, audio recordings. These may look like engagement solutions on paper, but in practice they fail the most basic test: teacher sustainability.

Where Advice Missed the Mark

  • Polls & exit tickets: With 60+ students, I either get 60 answers to process or must reduce everything to multiple-choice. Both are dehumanizing or administratively overwhelming.

  • Backchannels & anonymous questions: In theory, these give shy students a voice. In reality, they demand that I split my attention between live students and a screen, reducing the quality of face-to-face interaction my students actually need.

  • Audio notes & micro-writing: These create piles of material for me to review outside of class, which is simply unmanageable. In large ESP classes, in-class demonstration and group work must be the assessment.

  • Humanizing with anecdotes: Telling personal stories is fine in smaller or higher-level classes. But when 80% of students don’t understand me, an anecdote becomes just more incomprehensible input. My humanity shows more clearly when I use their names and respect their presence.

  • Random call systems with numbers: I already know my students’ names. To reduce them to numbers is not efficiency—it’s erasure. Naming is one of the few humanizing moves I can make in such a crowded, high-anxiety space.

The Real Costs of Generic Solutions

What these suggestions ignored were the hidden costs to the teacher:

  • Time: Every extra collection task (polls, audio, micro-writing) multiplies grading hours exponentially.

  • Mental bandwidth: Splitting focus between tech platforms or written responses drains energy I need for live presence in the room.

  • Emotional labor: When the advice shifts responsibility off the students and onto me, I become the bottleneck for their learning.

  • Intellectual integrity: Simplifying tasks into “cute” one-sentence outputs does not prepare students for the critical thinking and translanguaging skills they will need in public-facing professional jobs.

Rethinking “Support”

What my experience highlights is a broader issue in language education: much of the published advice assumes teachers have infinite capacity to accommodate, monitor, and collect. It treats large classes as smaller ones “scaled up,” instead of recognizing their own dynamics.

In reality, large-class pedagogy must center teacher sustainability. Strategies only work if they:

  1. Require no extra grading or after-class processing.

  2. Shift responsibility back to students through group work and peer scaffolding.

  3. Respect cultural and emotional contexts (fear of mistakes, survival behaviors, face-saving).

  4. Lead directly to ESP outcomes: spoken confidence, translanguaging agility, professional communication skills.

Closing

What my students need most is not a flurry of new tech tools or low-stakes writing prompts. They need a structured, predictable space where their voices are heard, their names are known, and their efforts toward professional English use are respected. What I need most is a sustainable way to manage 62 young adults in a single room without burning myself out in the process.

Until pedagogical advice takes seriously both student affective realities and teacher survival realities, it will continue to miss the mark.

Four Questions to Ask Before Adopting Any Large-Class Strategy

When managing 40, 50, or 60+ learners, not every “best practice” is actually best. Before adding a new tool or activity, I now ask myself:

  1. Does this protect my bandwidth?

    • If it requires extra grading, monitoring, or outside-of-class work, it’s a “no.”

    • Large-class teaching only works if I can sustain it for 16 weeks without collapse.

  2. Does this shift responsibility to students?

    • The class should not depend on me collecting, checking, or interpreting every answer.

    • Students need to do the heavy lifting through group work, peer scaffolding, and live demonstration.

  3. Does this align with real ESP outcomes?

    • Will it build spoken confidence, translanguaging skills, or professional communication?

    • If not, it risks being busywork disguised as engagement.

  4. Does this respect human dignity?

    • Will students feel seen, named, and included—or reduced to numbers, ticks, and anonymous posts?

    • In crowded, anxious classrooms, dignity is one of the few levers I can still pull.

If the answer to any of these is “no,” I don’t adopt the practice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Portfolio for Maria Lisak, EdD

Week 1: Thresholds + Intuition

Gaps and Opportunities in the South Korean Digital Content Creation Landscape