Inquiry Projects & Qualitative Research: Learning from the Community

Most students are used to assignments that have clear instructions, right answers, and fixed outcomes. But real-world welfare administration doesn’t work that way. It involves questions without easy answers, systems that don’t always function as designed, and communities with diverse needs. That’s where inquiry projects come in.

Why Inquiry-Based Learning Matters

Inquiry-based learning shifts the focus from memorizing information to investigating questions. Justice et al. (2007) show that when students design their own inquiries, they gain deeper critical thinking skills and a stronger sense of ownership in learning. Instead of passively absorbing content, they learn how to ask, observe, and reflect — the same habits needed in professional practice.

Teacher research and practitioner inquiry also highlight how inquiry is a stance, not just a classroom activity. Cochran-Smith & Lytle (2009) emphasize that inquiry reshapes how we see knowledge: as something built through questioning, reflection, and collaborative meaning-making. For welfare students, this means understanding their future role not only as administrators but also as reflective practitioners who continuously learn from the communities they serve.

Observation as the First Step

In qualitative research, observation is often the easiest and most revealing entry point. Watching how systems operate — who waits in line, how signage works, whether kiosks are accessible — highlights the gap between policy and lived experience. Lincoln & Guba (1985) remind us that naturalistic inquiry depends on attending to the real-world context, rather than trying to control it. For welfare administration students, this means learning to see systems in action before attempting to solve problems.

Local, Community-Embedded Research

Embedding inquiry in the local community makes it especially meaningful. When students investigate welfare administration in Gwangju, they connect classroom theory with everyday realities:

  • Civic education: Understanding how welfare systems affect citizens.

  • Professional preparation: Practicing observation and reflection in real contexts.

  • Empathy and perspective-taking: Seeing services from the viewpoint of those who use them.

Campano (2016) extends this idea, showing that community-based inquiry deepens not just academic learning but also civic imagination — the ability to envision more just and responsive systems. For welfare administration students, this opens up possibilities for linking classroom inquiry to real social change.

Takeaway

Inquiry projects are not about finding the “right” answer. They are about cultivating curiosity, patience, and reflection — qualities that define good administrators. By observing their own communities, students practice being investigators, problem-solvers, and ultimately, more responsive professionals.


References

  • Campano, G. (2016). Partnering with immigrant communities: Action through literacy. Teachers College Press.

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.

  • Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 201–214.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

  • Callahan, K., & Rademacher, A. (2014). Using fieldwork in public administration education: Experiential learning to connect classroom and community. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(1), 35–50.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Portfolio for Maria Lisak, EdD

Week 1: Thresholds + Intuition

Gaps and Opportunities in the South Korean Digital Content Creation Landscape