Dialoguing with the Algorithm: An Autoethnographic Study of Midlife Voice, Uncertainty, and Teacher Identity in a ChatGPT Exchange
Dialoguing with the Algorithm: An Autoethnographic Study of Midlife Voice, Uncertainty, and Teacher Identity in a ChatGPT Exchange
Abstract: This autoethnographic study examines how teacher identity is negotiated and reconstituted through AI-mediated dialogue, focusing on the experiences of an aging, foreign educator in the Korean EFL context. Through analysis of a single extended ChatGPT exchange initiated during ESP syllabus redesign, the study reveals five critical moments where professional identity was performed, contested, and remade: prompting as identity performance, encountering algorithmic voice, resistance and revoicing, epistemic dissonance and becoming, and dialogic pedagogy and the emergent self.
Drawing on theories of aging and teacher identity (Day & Kington, 2008; Hargreaves, 2005), dialogic voice (Bakhtin, 2010; Barad, 2007), and critical perspectives on digital labor (Standing, 2011; Oliveira et al., 2023), the research positions AI not as a neutral tool but as a discursive partner that actively participates in identity construction. The findings demonstrate that AI encounters function as sites of intensified reflection where professional voice must be reclaimed, pedagogical care recontextualized, and educational authority both challenged and reasserted through what the study identifies as "conscious cultural mediation"—explicit bridge-building work between Korean and Western educational values.
Rather than simply threatening or enhancing teacher agency, AI tools create new spaces for dialogic identity work, particularly for educators navigating intersections of aging, precarity, and technological change. The study contributes to autoethnographic methodology by demonstrating how AI platforms function as cultural sites requiring ethnographic attention, while revealing the "epistemic labor" of AI collaboration—the skilled professional work of evaluating, contextualizing, and adapting algorithmically-generated suggestions according to situated cultural knowledge and ethical commitments.
The research challenges binary framings of AI as either salvation or threat, instead revealing the complex identity negotiations that emerge when experienced educators engage AI as both reflective mirror and provocateur in their ongoing professional becoming. For teacher education, this implies moving beyond technical AI training toward developing critical digital literacy that encompasses reflexive practice, cultural humility, and the maintenance of pedagogical sovereignty within collaborative human-AI relationships.
Keywords: Autoethnography; Teacher Identity; Artificial Intelligence; Aging Educators; Dialogic Pedagogy; Cultural Mediation; Digital Labor
Bio: Maria Lisak EdD (How to cite) With over 30 years of EFL experience, Maria Lisak, EdD is a Full-time Professor in the Department of Administration Welfare at Chosun University, where she teaches social entrepreneurship in English using experiential learning and sociocultural approaches. Her work integrates constructivist and emancipatory frameworks, with research focusing on funds of knowledge, Gwangju as Method, and social justice education. She also designs educational materials for diverse ESP contexts, linking classroom practice with community needs. Her current interests include literacy, culture, and language education, and participatory frameworks for teacher wellbeing. She is the current President of the Gwangju-Jeonnam Chapter of KOTESOL, and a lifetime member of KOTESOL and AsiaTEFL. Her interdisciplinary work invites reflection on multimodal pedagogies, material making, and context-driven innovation in borderland spaces.
Introduction
- The Path
- The Current Destination
- My Baggage - What I bring with me
- Why AI and identity? Why now? I need to unlearn. Again.
- Repurposing What I Packed: The Chat as Dialogic Mirror
Framework
Aging and Identity Work in Transnational English Teaching
- Aging, Teacher Identity, and Emotional Labor
- Aging in TESOL/EFL: Language, Identity, and Global Mobility
- Bridge to Analytical Framework
Voice, Reflexivity, and Dialogic Becoming
- Bakhtinian Dialogism and Voice
- Performativity and Identity Constitution
- Intra-activity and Material-Discursive Practices
- Collaborative Authorship and Voice Ownership
- Critical AI Studies and Voice
- Marginality and Resistance
- Dialogic Pedagogy and Emergent Selfhood
- Synthesis: Identity as Ongoing Achievement
AI-Mediated Labor and Liminal Pedagogy
- Labor, Reputation & Precarity
- The Seduction and Suspicion of Efficiency
- Design Work as Vulnerable Labor
- The Temporal Politics of AI Adoption
- Agency, Automation, and Professional Identity
- Synthesis: Reframing AI as Labor Condition
Framework Synthesis: AI Encounters as Sites of Embodied Identity Work
Methods
Autoethnography
- Overview of Approach
- Autoethnographic Orientation
- Ethical Considerations
Researcher Positionality: Navigating Cultural and Institutional Contexts
- The Korean EFL Educational Landscape
- My Positioning Within These Dynamics
- Institutional Precarity and Cultural Positioning
- Ethical Considerations of Cultural Representation
Data Collection & Analysis
- Data Sources
- Analytical Procedures
- Critical Incident Analysis
- Analysis of AI Response Patterns
- Theoretical Anchoring
- Synthesis
Findings & Analysis
A. Prompting as Identity Performance
- Data Context and Selection Rationale
- Excerpt & Interpretation
- Analysis of AI Response Pattern
- Theoretical Anchor: Performativity and Dialogic Identity
B. Encountering Algorithmic Voice
Data Context and Selection Rationale
Excerpt & Interpretation
Analysis of Voice Characteristics
- Structural sophistication: Responses were invariably well-organized with clear hierarchies, parallel formatting, and logical progression
- Comprehensive coverage: The AI attempted to address multiple dimensions of complex pedagogical questions simultaneously
- Confident assertion: Suggestions were presented without hedging language or acknowledgment of cultural/contextual limitations
- Universal applicability: Recommendations assumed transferability across cultural and institutional contexts
- Efficiency orientation: Solutions were presented as streamlined and implementable without extended reflection or adaptation
Theoretical Anchor: Dialogic Voice Theory and Algorithmic Discourse
C. Resistance and Revoicing
Data Context and Selection Rationale
Excerpt & Interpretation
- Cultural explanation: Explicitly naming Korean cultural values (face, harmony) that shape classroom interaction
- Pedagogical reframing: Shifting from "peer review" to "collaborative problem-solving" to change the activity's cultural resonance
- Structural adaptation: Modifying the process to begin with strength identification rather than criticism
- Authority positioning: Placing myself as facilitator to manage cultural dynamics and ensure appropriate tone
Analysis of Resistance Patterns
- Cultural correction: Modifying suggestions that assumed Western classroom norms
- Temporal adjustment: Slowing down AI suggestions that assumed rapid implementation without relationship-building
- Ethical screening: Filtering out approaches that might compromise my commitments to student dignity and cultural respect
- Contextual grounding: Adding institutional and student-specific details that the AI couldn't access
- Voice reclamation: Asserting my interpretive authority over final pedagogical decisions
Theoretical Anchor: Collaborative Authorship and Agential Realism
D. Epistemic Dissonance and Becoming
Data Context and Selection Rationale
Excerpt & Interpretation
- Cultural knowledge vs. pedagogical theory: My experiential understanding of Korean classroom dynamics conflicting with established Western pedagogical frameworks
- Universalist vs. contextualist assumptions: The AI's assumption that certain pedagogical approaches are universally effective vs. my knowledge of cultural specificity
- Professional preparation vs. cultural appropriateness: Tension between preparing students for globalized professional contexts and respecting local cultural values
- Individual vs. collective learning orientations: Western emphasis on individual critical thinking vs. Korean emphasis on collective harmony and consensus-building
Analysis of Epistemic Disruption
Theoretical Anchor: Liminality, Transformative Learning, and Epistemic Justice
E. Dialogic Pedagogy and the Emergent Self
Data Context and Selection Rationale
Excerpt & Interpretation
- Articulated pedagogical philosophy: For the first time in the exchange, I offered a comprehensive statement of my teaching approach that integrated cultural positioning, student needs, and professional values
- Metaphorical framing: The concept of "cultural bridge spaces" provided new language for understanding work I had been doing intuitively for years
- Synthesis rather than compromise: Reframing cultural adaptation not as diluting pedagogical effectiveness but as creating more sophisticated approaches
- Identity claiming: Asserting a specific professional identity that embraced rather than apologized for cultural mediation work
Analysis of Dialogic Emergence
- Articulation of tacit knowledge: Making explicit the cultural and pedagogical knowledge I had developed through years of practice but never systematically examined
- Pattern recognition: Identifying consistent themes and approaches across different teaching contexts and decisions
- Value clarification: Becoming more conscious of the ethical and cultural commitments that guide my pedagogical choices
- Identity integration: Developing more coherent understanding of how different aspects of my professional identity (cultural mediator, experienced educator, critical pedagogue) work together
- Future visioning: Beginning to imagine how this emergent identity might guide future professional development and teaching practice
Theoretical Anchor: Dialogic Becoming and Intra-Active Pedagogy
Synthesis of Emergent Identity Work
- Performative positioning: Strategically presenting professional selfhood while remaining open to reconfiguration
- Voice negotiation: Engaging with algorithmic discourse while maintaining cultural and ethical authority
- Resistant appropriation: Selectively using AI suggestions while transforming them according to situated knowledge
- Epistemic reflexivity: Using moments of dissonance to examine assumptions and develop more sophisticated understanding
- Dialogic articulation: Developing explicit language for pedagogical approaches that had previously remained tacit
Discussion
Implications for Teacher Education and AI-Mediated Praxis
- Dialogic Identity Work in Digital Spaces
- The Labor of Ethical Judgment
- Precarity, Aging, and Professional Relevance
Theoretical Contributions
Extending Autoethnographic Method
- ChatGPT as Ethnographic Site: Digital Place and Cultural Practice
- ChatGPT as Cultural Space
- Temporal Culture
- Discourse Norms
- Authority Structures
- Interaction Rituals
- The Digital Classroom as Hybrid Space
- Digital Labor as Cultural Practice
Methodological Implications
- Reconceptualizing AI as Discursive Partner
Limitations and Future Research
- Paradigmatic Limitations
- Future Research: Centering Aging and Intersectional Experience
Conclusion
Theoretical Contributions and Findings
Implications for Practice and Policy
Methodological Innovation and Future Directions
The Continuing Conversation
Comments
Post a Comment